Toonade
β€’
8 min read

TOON vs JSON: Comparing Data Formats for the AI Era

Data representation methods are transforming rapidly as Large Language Models reshape how we work with structured information. JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) has dominated web development for more than ten years, but TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation) is gaining traction as a specialized format tailored for artificial intelligence applications.

This comparison will help you understand which format works best for your LLM projects, token budgets, and data processing needs.

1. JSON: The Established Standard

JSON has served as the universal data exchange format across the internet for many years. Its straightforward, human-readable design uses clear delimiters, making it ideal for general data communication between systems.

Syntax Characteristics: Detailed and explicit; requires repeated key names, curly braces, square brackets, colons, and commas throughout the structure.

Main Advantage: Broad compatibility with virtually every programming language and platform.

AI Limitation: Increased token consumption. Each punctuation mark and duplicated key name counts as a token, raising expenses and consuming more of the context window when processing with language models.

πŸ“ JSON Example: Tabular Data

A standard JSON structure with three user entries:

{
  "users": [
    { "id": 1, "name": "Sreeni", "role": "admin" },
    { "id": 2, "name": "Krishna", "role": "admin" },
    { "id": 3, "name": "Aaron", "role": "user" }
  ]
}

2. TOON: Optimized for Token Economy

TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation) represents an innovative approach designed to address token consumption challenges in language model operations. By reducing unnecessary syntax elements, it delivers substantial token reductions.

Syntax Characteristics: Concise; employs indentation and defines column names a single time at the beginning of each data block.

Main Advantage: Superior token economy (achieving 30–60% reduction for tabular datasets), which results in lower costs and more efficient language model interactions.

Core Design Principle: By defining the schema once in the header and then listing values in rows, TOON removes the overhead of repeatedly including key names and structural punctuation.

πŸ“ TOON Example: Same Data

The identical information encoded in TOON format:

users[3]{id,name,role}:
  1,Sreeni,admin
  2,Krishna,admin
  3,Aaron,user

Efficiency Note:

When working with structured, tabular information like this, TOON typically uses approximately half the tokens compared to JSON. The benefits become even more pronounced as dataset sizes increase.

3. The Trade-Off: Handling Complex Nesting 🧐

TOON excels with regular, tabular data, but the advantages diminish when working with deeply nested, non-uniform structures.

πŸ“ JSON Example: Nested Structure

{
  "project": {
    "name": "Apollo",
    "status": "active",
    "team": [
      { 
        "id": 101, 
        "role": "lead", 
        "contact": { "email": "alice@ex.com" }
      }
    ]
  }
}

JSON Strength: The clear boundaries created by curly braces and square brackets establish unambiguous element boundaries at any nesting level. This clarity enables language models to parse complex structures reliably, which is essential for intricate configurations or logic definitions.

πŸ“ TOON Example: Nested Structure

project:
  name: Apollo
  status: active
  team[1]{id,role,contact}:
    101,lead,contact{email}:
      alice@ex.com

TOON Limitation: TOON represents nested structures through indentation. Array elements (like team) continue to provide token savings, but for simple nested objects (such as contact), the advantage becomes less significant. With extremely deep or irregular nesting patterns, the token count gap between TOON and a minified JSON representation can narrow or even reverse in some cases.

🎯 Making the Right Choice

The optimal approach isn't choosing one format exclusively, but rather understanding when each format provides the best solution:

Use TOON when:

  • β€’ Token efficiency and large, uniform data are involved
  • β€’ RAG pipelines
  • β€’ Sending database query results to an LLM agent
  • β€’ Structured LLM output generation

Use JSON when:

  • β€’ Interoperability is paramount
  • β€’ Parsing reliability for deeply nested structures
  • β€’ API definitions
  • β€’ Complex configurations

Key Takeaway

TOON serves as a purpose-built solution for AI development, focused on minimizing the most critical resource in language model applications: token consumption.

Ready to measure the impact on your language model expenses with TOON? Explore our conversion tools and see how much you can save.

Ready to try TOON?

Convert your JSON to TOON format and see the token savings yourself.